


Alliance Exteriors installs PVC, WPC and composite products as a standard part of our work. We specify them on most Hardie jobs we build. So this page is not an argument that cellular PVC is a bad material.
It is an argument about scope.
Cellular PVC is excellent at a specific set of jobs, and on those jobs it beats wood decisively. As the field cladding across a full elevation — the large, continuous, sun-exposed surfaces that make up most of a house — it is the wrong choice, and fibre cement is the right one.
That is the whole page. The rest is why.
We are putting this first because we mean it.
Cellular PVC does not rot. It does not absorb water. It holds a crisp machined profile, which matters enormously on trim, where the eye reads a clean edge or a fuzzy one from thirty feet away. A wood corner board in the GTA is a maintenance schedule. A cellular PVC corner board is not.
The bottom of a wall is where water collects, splashes back off hard landscaping, and sits under snow load for months. Anything organic down there is on a clock. Cellular PVC is indifferent to it. When we detail a base condition, a skirt band, a column wrap or a trim piece sitting close to grade, PVC is often the material we want.
Brackets, mouldings, sills, rake and frieze details. Pieces that get machined, mitred and glued rather than nailed through a face. PVC takes that work well.
None of this is a consolation prize. These are real applications where the material's properties are the entire point, and we specify it there on purpose. See PVC, WPC & Composite Siding for what we install.
Trim is short, narrow, broken up by joints every few feet, and usually partly sheltered. The field of a wall is long, continuous, and fully exposed. Those are not the same engineering problem, and the standards behind these products reflect that.
Wood-plastic composite is governed by ASTM D7032, and the full title tells you what it covers: "Standard Specification for Establishing Performance Ratings for Wood-Plastic Composite and Plastic Lumber Deck Boards, Stair Treads, Guards, and Handrails."
Deck boards. Stair treads. Guards. Handrails. It is a horizontal walking-surface and guard standard. It is not a cladding specification.
That matters, and it is worth being precise about why. ASTM D7032 is not a weak document. It explicitly evaluates ultraviolet resistance, freeze-thaw resistance, biodeterioration, temperature and moisture effects, creep-recovery, flame spread index, slip resistance and mechanical fastener holding capacity. The standard states its purpose is "to establish a basis for code recognition of these products or systems in exterior applications."
Read that list again. Those are the properties the standard's own authors identified as needing to be measured for this material. UV. Freeze-thaw. Biodeterioration. Movement with temperature and moisture. Creep. Fastener holding.
We are not saying WPC fails those evaluations. We are saying the material's governing specification is written for horizontal deck and guard components, and it tests exactly the properties you would worry about if you took that material and hung it across a two-storey south elevation instead.
A house clad entirely in composite is asking a decking material to do a cladding material's job.
ASTM D3679 is the standard for rigid PVC siding, and it caps non-PVC content at less than 20% by volume. That is a useful number for a homeowner to hold onto: by that standard, a product with more filler than that is not rigid PVC siding.
If someone is selling you a "PVC composite" board for a whole elevation, the fair question is what standard it is manufactured and evaluated to, and what is actually in it. Ask for the document. A good supplier will hand it over.
James Hardie fibre cement is made to ASTM C1186 Grade II Type A. Type A is the classification for exterior applications directly exposed to sun, rain and snow. That is not a footnote — that is the entire application we are discussing. The companion ASTM C1185 test regime includes freeze-thaw testing for cladding products.
Fibre cement is cement, sand, cellulose fibre and water plus proprietary additives, formed under pressure, textured, cured and cut. It is a mineral board, and it is specified for the exposure it is going into.
PVC and composite products move significantly with temperature. That is not a defect; it is a property. It is also why these products carry demanding fastening and gapping requirements.
On a piece of trim, that movement is manageable. The runs are short and the accommodation is small.
Across the long horizontal runs of a full elevation, it is a different exercise. GTA temperatures swing from roughly -25 C to +35 C over a year. Every joint and every fastener on that wall has to accommodate the movement, correctly, the first time. The field tolerance for error is small, and the consequence of getting it wrong is visible from the street for as long as you own the house.
Fibre cement's dimensional behaviour is much less demanding on the installer over long runs. On a project with a lot of wall and a lot of crew hours, that difference compounds.
Fibre cement is noncombustible per ASTM E136, and Class A per ASTM E84 with a flame spread of 0 and smoke developed of less than 5 (ICC-ES ESR-2290, ESR-1844). Hardie states a caveat itself, and we repeat it: that performance belongs to the board, not the coating. Paint may char in direct flame even though the substrate will not ignite.
Cellular PVC and WPC are not noncombustible materials. If fire performance is a factor on your project, confirm the fire performance of the specific product you are being sold against your project's requirements, in that product's own documentation.
Fibre cement boards are individually replaceable. If a ladder goes through one, you take out one board and put in one board. It installs over a drained, ventilated assembly, which is what makes the rest of the wall work.
| James Hardie fibre cement | Cellular PVC / WPC composite | |
|---|---|---|
| Right job | The field of the wall — large, continuous, sun-exposed elevations | Trim, corner boards, window and door surrounds, wet zones near grade, machined detail |
| Governing standard | ASTM C1186 Grade II Type A — exterior, directly exposed to sun, rain and snow | WPC: ASTM D7032, written for deck boards, stair treads, guards and handrails |
| Movement | Modest; forgiving over long runs | Significant with temperature; demanding fastening and gapping over long runs |
| Rot and water | No organic food source in the board | Does not rot and does not absorb water — its core strength |
| Fire | Noncombustible (ASTM E136); Class A per ASTM E84, flame spread 0, smoke under 5 | Not noncombustible; confirm the specific product's documentation |
| Repairs | Individual boards are replaceable | Depends on profile and fastening method |
On a typical Hardie project we build, you will find cellular PVC on the corner boards, around the windows and doors, and anywhere the detail sits close to grade. The field of the wall is fibre cement. That is not a compromise between two products — it is each material doing the job it is best at.
If a contractor proposes composite for an entire elevation, ask which standard the product is evaluated to and what the fastening schedule is over a twenty-foot run. The answer will tell you whether they have thought about it.
No, and we would not install it if it were. It does not rot, does not absorb water and holds a machined edge better than wood. Those properties make it the correct choice for trim, corner boards and wet zones near grade. The argument on this page is about using it as the field cladding across a full elevation, which is a different job.
Because a standard is written around an application. D7032 evaluates UV resistance, freeze-thaw resistance, biodeterioration, temperature and moisture movement, creep and fastener holding — for deck boards, stair treads, guards and handrails. Fibre cement's standard, ASTM C1186 Grade II Type A, is written for exterior boards directly exposed to sun, rain and snow. That is the application we are talking about.
We will not make a prediction about a specific product we have not seen the documentation for. What we can say is that these products move meaningfully with temperature, that the movement has to be accommodated at every joint and fastener across a long run, and that the tolerance for installation error is smaller than with fibre cement.
Yes. That is what we recommend and what we build most often — fibre cement for the field, cellular PVC for the trim and the wet details.
Fibre cement is noncombustible per ASTM E136 and Class A per ASTM E84, with flame spread 0 and smoke developed under 5. Cellular PVC and WPC are not noncombustible. If fire performance matters on your project, get the specific product's own documentation rather than a general assurance from anyone, including us.
That is what our exterior design consultations are for. We will walk your elevations, tell you what we would actually specify and why, and be straight with you if fibre cement is not the right answer.
Book a Design Consultation
